4 ms·
>I bring this up every time someone says "PGSQL > MongoDB", even on PGSQL threads where PGSQL devs participate and they admit it's not quite there yet Do you h
by crdoconnor 12y ago
>I bring this up every time someone says "PGSQL > MongoDB", even on PGSQL threads where PGSQL devs participate and they admit it's not quite there yet
Do you have a link to such a thread where pgsql devs admit its inferiority?
- craigching 12y agoHere's a link to my thread. I don't know that I'd say "inferior" just "harder to configure." Please bear that in mind, that's all I'm saying here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6693027 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6693027