>I'd be careful about overvaluing the mystique of the human element. In classical chess computers are absolutely, positively dominating humans. It's not that c

>I'd be careful about overvaluing the mystique of the human element. In classical chess computers are absolutely, positively dominating humans. It's not that computers are perfect, they are not, but they are so dominate at the aspects they are good at, humans cannot cope. It's like a soccer player whose only skill is being able to run 10x faster than everyone else. It doesn't matter if that player can barely kick the ball, they will be so fast that they will cover all of their mistakes and dominate every other human player on the field by a large margin.