"Debunk" was my word, not Scott's, and you're right, it's overly harsh. I've edited my post. But Scott did convince me, at least, that this paper is nowhere ne

"Debunk" was my word, not Scott's, and you're right, it's overly harsh. I've edited my post. But Scott did convince me, at least, that this paper is nowhere near as relevant or important as the authors make it out to me.