4 ms·
I wouldn't be surprised if plan9 builds are an order of magnitude faster per LoC - Deeply nested includes and cyclic includes waste a huge amount of time. Avoi
by andrewchambers 12y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if plan9 builds are an order of magnitude faster per LoC - Deeply nested includes and cyclic includes waste a huge amount of time.
Avoiding cyclic dependencies might also be a good thing in terms of overall software design.
- dorfsmay 12y agoCompile time, sure, but that shouldn't influence running time.
- f2f 12y agoplan9 kernel builds take less that 10 seconds.
- andrewchambers 12y agoYeah, this is awesome... If gcc or the linux kernel compiled in 10 seconds, the world would be a better place.