4 ms·
Although in theory I'm a huge support of greater local governance, things like these are why I'm a bit skeptical in practice. When companies can force states t
by Fede_V 12y ago
Although in theory I'm a huge support of greater local governance, things like these are why I'm a bit skeptical in practice.
When companies can force states to bid in exchange for jobs, or to lower labour regulation/environmental restrictions, etc, it's a very dangerous slippery road.
- iandanforth 12y agoDid they get labor law concessions? I didn't see that bit in the article. If you're referring to the direct-sales law I'm not sure that counts.
- Fede_V 12y agoIn this case, no. They merely obtained massive tax breaks and lots of free land/roads. However, even if you completely support local governance in the abstract, is there a limit past which you feel uncomfortable in terms of concessions to draw in jobs? For example, Ireland has structured its tax laws exactly in the way foreign corporations demand so EU based corps can avoid paying taxes. Should this be allowed?
- freerobby 12y agoDangerous how?
- discardorama 12y ago> When companies can force states ... I must've missed something, but where was "force" applied? Did Tesla threaten to sue Nevada (or Texas)? Did they send in teams of lawyers, threatening to shut the state down? No. All that happened was a bit of aggressive negotiation with adult parties, who were more than willing to play the game. Nobody "forced" anybody to do anything.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]