3 ms·
I did stop, many years ago, in part because I was tired of this sort of thread. People who don't know the requirements and don't bother to learn anything go on
by hp 12y ago
I did stop, many years ago, in part because I was tired of this sort of thread. People who don't know the requirements and don't bother to learn anything go on ill-informed rants about other people's work. Hey, it's no longer officially my problem. But the people who are still working on improving the software still don't deserve the abuse.
- brainsalad 12y agoIf only the folks at Redhat were improving things and not playing your sorts of passive-aggressive political games...
- felixgallo 12y agoThank you for stopping.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- emcrazyone 12y agothey go on these rants because the documentation is so dam poor. The OP lists blatant contradictions. Your response further up would be quite helpful in the code and/or in the documentation. I work in the embedded space and often read data sheets with similar contradictions or errors. It's almost like the documentation has to be as good as the code and idea. What good is the best mouse trap if no one knows how to use it. Poor documentation is a pet peeve of mine too and it's the poorly documented DBUS stuff is why I never bothered to even try to learn more about it.
- mwcampbell 12y ago> I did stop, many years ago, in part because I was tired of this sort of thread. Reading this makes me sad. So this is why we can't have nice things in free software for end users! I, for one, will try to remember to stop and think before criticizing any free software project from now on.
- voltagex_ 12y agoHow can I help improve the documentation?