3 ms·
Wouldn't the initial cost savings be offset by the ongoing challenges of dealing with a big moving chunk of hazmat?
by bequanna 12y ago
Wouldn't the initial cost savings be offset by the ongoing challenges of dealing with a big moving chunk of hazmat?
- tempestn 12y agoProbably... but it's still an intriguing idea! Especially since their pressurized gas proposal already calls for a sealed cavity; maybe there actually is potential there. (Of course, there would probably be a significant PR cost too.) That said, they can already get more weight by making the weight taller, so density likely isn't a huge benefit. Whatever's the cheapest cost/kg (and without the other issues of Uranium) would probably be best.
- SolarNet 12y agoWell at least if it fell it would be buried in a giant hole.