3 ms·
There's been a bit of revolution in OpenBSD as well, just smaller ones. OpenSSH, PF, and now LibreSSL were all fairly rapidly developed at inception due to issu
by hhw 12y ago
There's been a bit of revolution in OpenBSD as well, just smaller ones. OpenSSH, PF, and now LibreSSL were all fairly rapidly developed at inception due to issues with the original projects they replaced. They made it into the base system within 1 or 2 releases (every 6 months in OpenBSD), so there's no reticence to change or rapid development. However, they did take care to limit the projects to a well understood, readily achievable scope thus allowing them to ship on time (what a novel concept in software development!). OpenBSD also pioneered some major concepts in modern OS design such as privilege separation which has since been adopted by most other comparable operating systems. Yes, they do an excellent job of maintaining consistency, but a lot of that has to do with good design and careful choices, and not because they've avoided change.
- dredmorbius 12y agoOpenBSD has a remarkable history of identifying key and crucial elements and providing replacements on its own where necessary. It's also working on a set of Systemd shims as a replacement for systemd: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTc4MjQ http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTc4MjQ