3 ms·
Very misleading title. This is not about a GC speed up, it is about a reduction in pause time. The GC a itself is eating as many cycles as before (possibly more
by jblow 12y ago
Very misleading title. This is not about a GC speed up, it is about a reduction in pause time. The GC a itself is eating as many cycles as before (possibly more due to the cost of making things incremental) and they are clear about this in the article.
- dang 12y agoOk, we changed the title.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]