5 ms·
>Also, be aware that even if you know it is unenforceable, the nasty letter may scare your next employer I am curious about this part. Why would the next emplo
by andyjdavis 12y ago
>Also, be aware that even if you know it is unenforceable, the nasty letter may scare your next employer
I am curious about this part. Why would the next employer even care, given that they are not party to any agreement made between the individual and their previous employer?
- minimax 12y agoMaybe the next employer doesn't have a full time lawyer or doesn't think it's worth the hassle. Or they don't want to hire someone who is going to have to quit in a month because they decide the contract is enforceable. For what it's worth, I have seen it play out in the exact opposite way. I was working at a company that took great pride in having the best engineering talent and also happened to have a very good (very expensive) in-house counsel. We hired a crop of engineers away from another company and subsequently got a nastygram from the previous company about hiring the guys. If anything, it convinced the management that they made the right decision to hire the guys, and they put the in-house counsel to work shredding the previous company's legal arguments. It was pretty fun to watch.
- indymike 12y agoInterfering with a contract is a tort. If my company hires you, and you have a non-compete, the previous employer can sue my company. It doesn't matter if the contract is legal or not, my company will have to pony up to defend the lawsuit. http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/wrongful-or-tortious-interference-with-contracts.html http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/wrongful-or-to...
- Silhouette 12y agoAlthough in that case, if the NCA was unenforceable, a lawyer might also have fun reversing that principle and claiming tortious interference with the business relationship between the employee and the new employer/prospective employer by the former employer...