No security professional will be bothered to critique "FSS" because anybody worth their salt know that any log ON a server is, by definition, not trustworthy.

No security professional will be bothered to critique "FSS" because anybody worth their salt know that any log ON a server is, by definition, not trustworthy. They've known this for at least 20 years (if not longer), and everyone uses syslogd or some variant thereof. So, in that sense, there is no controversy here, and this feature is, for the most part, completely useless. In the comments below, Andrew Wyatt is absolutely correct and this, "Lennart Poettering" individual doesn't know what they are talking about.