4 ms·

Lets see it this way, does the amoeba simulation ever begin to show signs of evolving? Even if given a millenia? If no, then it's not intelligence, call it vide

• waps 12y ago
  I believe this is the most advanced artificial lifeform that is intended to be a full simulation of the real thing : http://www.openworm.org/ http://www.openworm.org/ ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2OBznK6HkI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2OBznK6HkI ) Yes, it evolves. Well, in theory : running time is nowhere near what would be necessary at the moment. Note that non-evolving versions would be extremely valuable as well. Evolution happens, but individuals don't. So if you want, say, medical advances, evolution is probably one of the first things you'd throw out. But if you are generally looking for artificial intelligence that evolves, there's tons and tons of examples. The problem here is that people aren't usually all that comfortable with real running evolution during "production". People want standard, reliable solutions that perform every time. The way this is done is to "freeze" the algorithm's evolution before actually using it (or even, as Geoffrey Hinton pointed out, first train an algorithm on the actual problem, then train a second algorithm to simply exactly imitate the first's behavior, which has much better results. Or even train a second one using a non-evolving algorithm like decision trees, which I'm told is often done in finance).
• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
• natch 12y ago
  The author is simply ignorant. This kind of evolution of simulated amoeba-like organisms was done over 20 years ago with Tierra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tierra_(computer_simulation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tierra_(computer_simulation)