>If FreeBSD doesn't support my hardware, it's the equivalent of being broken for me, given that I can't use it anyway That's the point. People like to pretend

>If FreeBSD doesn't support my hardware, it's the equivalent of being broken for me, given that I can't use it anyway That's the point. People like to pretend linux has more hardware support, but mostly what is has is broken drivers for obscure buggy hardware that you can't actually use. The "well supported stable hardware that actually works" list is practically identical between them.