3 ms·
Except the whole argument was that the 3rd party company wasn't doing it, it was simply providing a location for the customer's rented property to sit, wasn't i
by crazypyro 12y ago
Except the whole argument was that the 3rd party company wasn't doing it, it was simply providing a location for the customer's rented property to sit, wasn't it?
- res0nat0r 12y agoBasically the 3rd party didn't have a right to redistribute the content which is what the court ruled.