I'm sorry nailer, but do you honestly think that what you've just proposed proposed is an accurate reflection of the situation with Pando and Uber? Because ther

I'm sorry nailer, but do you honestly think that what you've just proposed proposed is an accurate reflection of the situation with Pando and Uber? Because there's a world of difference between journalists reporting on companies under clear bylines, and companies attempting to silence journalists through acts of personal intimidation that have their precise origins concealed. Forget apples to oranges. What you're describing is (possibly rotten) apples to hand grenades. But since you asked, no, I wouldn't dream of behaving this way. If a reporter published something demonstrably false, I'd demand a correction. If the pattern persisted, I'd take them to court. You know, like a civilized human being, not some goddamned Mafioso or a member of the KGB.