4 ms·

Scale has its advantage, products like Google Now or a Home Robot/Assistant is not possible unless there are a ton of data points available to be processed. I t

Scale has its advantage, products like Google Now or a Home Robot/Assistant is not possible unless there are a ton of data points available to be processed. I thinking breaking up is not a solution, but rather content(headlines included) and data about customer should be traded between companies using APIs. Like a data exchange, just like exchanges for electricity and other utilities. Imagine a time in future when you want a fancy Apple robot, but that robot is dumb unless it has access to all of your current and past data.

Someone 12y ago
I think you are making two opposite statements: "should be traded between companies using APIs" gives me he impression you want to give the companies control over your^W their data. At the moment there are laws prohibiting the former, IMO rightfully so. "when you want a fancy Apple robot, but that robot is dumb unless it has access to all of your current and past data." makes it look as if you want humans to have control over who has access to their data. I think that should be the norm, and if laws are retired to get there, I think we should get them.
- maverick2 12y ago
  ok, yep let me clear that. What I mean is -Companies should be able to own and trade their users data with other companies. This should be like a stock or ad exchange. More pull requests for certain data, higher the data connection price. -Also blogs should be able to charge $0 or some amount for search bots to crawl them. Its demand and supply if. NYT might be able to ask for some price while Buzzfeed can say .. eh we'll set that to free. -Now for user, Example If I pay $200 for a robot - The company can say, hey it is $10 to use it monthly(because the robot company figures that is avg cost to fetch data, lets say from Goog FB AMZN etc). But some companies can say, the data of their users is owned by them and their user so if the user want to use his/her data then its free. But if the company wants to use to for some other means without user consent then its up for sale. Its kind of like twitter's firehose, just more universal. Will encourage companies to develop APIs since now they can charge its use. I'd love a google now/robot to suggest me what netflix flick I should see based on my Bing search history.

Someone 12y ago

I think you are making two opposite statements: "should be traded between companies using APIs" gives me he impression you want to give the companies control over your^W their data. At the moment there are laws prohibiting the former, IMO rightfully so. "when you want a fancy Apple robot, but that robot is dumb unless it has access to all of your current and past data." makes it look as if you want humans to have control over who has access to their data. I think that should be the norm, and if laws are retired to get there, I think we should get them.

maverick2 12y ago
ok, yep let me clear that. What I mean is -Companies should be able to own and trade their users data with other companies. This should be like a stock or ad exchange. More pull requests for certain data, higher the data connection price. -Also blogs should be able to charge $0 or some amount for search bots to crawl them. Its demand and supply if. NYT might be able to ask for some price while Buzzfeed can say .. eh we'll set that to free. -Now for user, Example If I pay $200 for a robot - The company can say, hey it is $10 to use it monthly(because the robot company figures that is avg cost to fetch data, lets say from Goog FB AMZN etc). But some companies can say, the data of their users is owned by them and their user so if the user want to use his/her data then its free. But if the company wants to use to for some other means without user consent then its up for sale. Its kind of like twitter's firehose, just more universal. Will encourage companies to develop APIs since now they can charge its use. I'd love a google now/robot to suggest me what netflix flick I should see based on my Bing search history.