3 ms·

I don't think that's true. There are many instances in which we as a society have chosen disproportionate responses as a way to deter future infractions by oth

• peterwwillis 12y ago
  The only time the first example is disproportionate is when we fine corporations too little for their abuses, and that is never good. edit The damages you discuss are punitive damages, but again are not intended to be disproportionate; they are intended to be proportionate in a way that is an adequate remedy to the basis of a lawsuit (when compensatory damages won't work). Great judicial restraint is expected to be exercised in their application. Justice should always be proportionate. Sadly, there is often too little justice served in our society, and too much abuse, as evidenced by people defending disproportionate justice.
  • ganeumann 12y ago
    If this were true, then the difference between plea bargain fines and court-ordered fines would be the cost of a trial. This does not seem to be the case.
• grey-area 12y ago
  And yet in between the infractions and the punishment, however extreme, comes a system of justice based on laws, presumption of innocence, and equality before the law. An imperfect system, but at least one which aspires to impartiality and justice. The parent is objecting to replacing that justice system with mob justice (which is usually disproportionate, harmful to everyone involved, and often just plain wrong).