4 ms·
"not even close" Really? Because while Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes are far from perfect, they are quite useful in pointing out movies that have more rather
by afterburner 12y ago
"not even close"
Really? Because while Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes are far from perfect, they are quite useful in pointing out movies that have more rather than less quality.
- WalterBright 12y agoThose are aggregated peoples' opinions, which are subjective. I was thinking of objective metrics.
- afterburner 12y ago"what other people are willing to pay" is also "aggregated peoples' opinions"
- WalterBright 12y agoYou've never met people whose stated opinion did not match their behavior? I find that rather normal.
- afterburner 12y ago"Nobody has found a reliable metric to determine the quality of art, not even close, other than what others are freely willing to pay for it." "You've never met people whose stated opinion did not match their behavior? I find that rather normal." Are you retracting the freely paying method as a way to determine quality then? You're claiming then that there's no way at all to determine quality?