It's hard to take an article seriously which declares "Ruby on Rails" a programming language. At least the linked Quartz article added a correction. > Correcti

It's hard to take an article seriously which declares "Ruby on Rails" a programming language. At least the linked Quartz article added a correction. > Correction (Nov. 20): An earlier version of this article incorrectly referred to HTML5 and Ruby on Rails as programming languages. Of course, that just scratches the surface of problems with this article. Should we flag this? It's pretty much worthless to be posted on HN.