3 ms·
A bit surprised to see the analysis was of Super Smash Bros Melee and not Brawl. Not quite as much data on it (7 years vs 12)... For what it's worth, I actuall
by rubyn00bie 12y ago
A bit surprised to see the analysis was of Super Smash Bros Melee and not Brawl. Not quite as much data on it (7 years vs 12)...
For what it's worth, I actually wore out 3 Wiis playing smash bros for probably thousands of hours.
Also, great marketing effort releasing this the day before the new one releases.
- ixtli 12y agoUnsure what you mean: There is power ranking of brawl at the bottom from which you can extrapolate some of the same conclusions he talks about wrt melee.
- theseoafs 12y ago? You've got that backwards, Melee came out 5 years before Brawl.
- broodbucket 12y agoBrawl has much less of a storied competitive scene, and thus there's inherently less metagame development. Fox is considered the best character in Melee, but the margin that Meta Knight dominates Brawl by is far, far larger. Nowadays, competitive Brawl is pretty much dead, Melee still has large tournaments. I think the Melee tier story is far more interesting than the Brawl one since there's far less motivation to develop the lower tiers in Brawl. In Melee there's still some development in lower tiers like Game & Watch and Yoshi that could see them climb the ranks.