>Your premise requires an invalidation of modes of interactivity as meaningful. I feel this is worded a little strongly. I alluded to the fact that even just b

>Your premise requires an invalidation of modes of interactivity as meaningful. I feel this is worded a little strongly. I alluded to the fact that even just books can have modes of interactivity, but we don't consider them games. >then you will say that adventure games are not games, puzzle games are not games, etc. I believe that this is where some people's intuitive sense that something isn't a game comes from. Thanks for the link, I liked it a lot. I bob in and out of this stuff but I'm inspired to take it more seriously again.