Such disclaimers as the below would seem to directly contradict your claim that they espouse a "one-size-fits-all" approach: http://gettingreal.37signals.com/c

Such disclaimers as the below would seem to directly contradict your claim that they espouse a "one-size-fits-all" approach: http://gettingreal.37signals.com/ch01_Caveats_disclaimers_and_other_preemptive_strikes.php http://gettingreal.37signals.com/ch01_Caveats_disclaimers_an... Or is your complaint that they don't find it necessary to preface every single post on SvN with such disclaimers? In fact, this complaint would be addressed by that same link. I'm not trying to defend the Mint post by any means (although I do think, as someone else already mentioned, that the larger picture being painted by the post - once you get past the drama that has been generated - is interesting), I'm sure that post (and probably a few other posts) could have been handled better by Jason. But please, let's stop parroting the same old hyperbole about 37S.