3 ms·
That's probably not true. If you don't have the time, expertise, or space to legitimately cook something in it with whichever components of marijuana are utiliz
by codyb 12y ago
That's probably not true. If you don't have the time, expertise, or space to legitimately cook something in it with whichever components of marijuana are utilized in the cessation of nausea or pain, and you can't afford/don't have the time to go get/are not near a place where they sell a vaporizer then smoking is your best option. And recent research has suggested a litany of positive effects for those suffering from a variety of ailments.
In this case, smoking would be quite sensical not only because it will make you feel better. Stress is a known killer, symptoms such as nausea (and it's side effect known as 'not being able to eat') or pain increase stress. Ergo, it can be quite easily seen that there are many instances where a person would be quite sensical in choosing to smoke marijuana instead of continuing to suffer, negative side effects of smoking marijuana included.
This of course does not go into the debate of marijuana versus addictive opiates or more "traditional" forms of medication which opens up an additional set of conversation topics, many of which conclude that marijuana is more than likely to be preferred over traditional forms of Western medication.
- josefresco 12y agoObviously if given no other choice, smoking cannabis might be a viable option. It's important to keep this discussion in the context of the parent comment, which was pointing our (rather anecdotally) that some guy who smoked cannabis for 35 years died of cancer (implying that the assertion made in the parent article was incorrect or flawed).