Weird hypotheticals are a standard practice in philosophy. Also, 'yummyfajitas criticizes or disagrees with male people all the time too. It's only natural, i

Weird hypotheticals are a standard practice in philosophy. Also, 'yummyfajitas criticizes or disagrees with male people all the time too. It's only natural, if you omit vapid posts of agreement from your repertoire, that you're always going to be seen disagreeing with and criticizing people. Edit: Oh, I see that you've made these inane responses to yummyfajitas before. We can see an analog in your past comment: > You don't create as much discussion going the other way - there are no posts from you askng why society accepts most corporate boards having no women or asking why society accepts discrimination against people with Arab sounding names. All your questions are about why it's okay to discriminate against white males in these kinds of programmes. And yummyfajitas's reply: > No one on HN is defending discrimination against people with Arab sounding names. Perhaps the same sort of observation might be found on this axis of discussion? And this isn't the first time you've made some metacommentary aboutq yummyfajitas's posting history. This time it's "hatred of women", last time it was racism. What are you gonna try next time?