"... Presumption of guilt? ..." From what I've read here they (fbi) are doing simple background checks and want to talk. An interview/Talk doesn't imply a pres

"... Presumption of guilt? ..." From what I've read here they (fbi) are doing simple background checks and want to talk. An interview/Talk doesn't imply a presumption of guilt. Having said that the fact that the "pacer" usage may have been excessive & someone has complained means anyone with excessive usage is going to be looked at. There is no black and white here but shades of grey. The records probably should be in public hands. The means used so far might be illegal. The tussle is "public access" vs "payment" and the action taken is making the right waves to hightlight the need for the former ~ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13records.html http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13records.html