4 ms·
You will, however, be bound by current 'lawful intercept and storage' laws. If you provide a remote computing service (email, hosting, cloud storage, fitness tr
by xnull2guest 12y ago
You will, however, be bound by current 'lawful intercept and storage' laws. If you provide a remote computing service (email, hosting, cloud storage, fitness tracking, etc) you will be bound by 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) [1]. If you provide telecommunications you will be bound by CALEA [2]. You will be bound by the Stored Communications Act and by the Patriot Act, and you will be bound to provide access to the core of your service and/or your private keys if you are given an NSL.
Essentially - you can not provide secure communication as a service.
If you try to provide it as a product it's more blurry. With precedents like Blackberry, RSA and Skype you need to make sure you're operationally able to deal with extreme levels of leverage and influence.
[1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2703 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2703
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_...
- joering2 12y agoWill this also apply if your server is outside US. Example: you're using an US company (Rackspace) that is hosting your website in HongKong. Is there anywhere a list of "nay" voters.. I want to put few phonecalls in place tomorrow, express my disgust.
- quesera 12y agoUS companies are bound by US laws. Companies doing business in the US are bound by US laws. Server location not so important.
- g4k 12y agoYes, it will apply. Hosting location does not matter [1] [2] [1]: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/23/microsoft_vs_the_long_arm_of_us_law/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/23/microsoft_vs_the_lon... [2]: http://www.zdnet.com/yes-u-s-authorities-can-spy-on-eu-cloud-data-heres-how-7000010653/ http://www.zdnet.com/yes-u-s-authorities-can-spy-on-eu-cloud...