4 ms·
I can't imagine they'd force people to use 64 bit via an update. It's customary to give the option. http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel http:
by grimgrin 12y ago
I can't imagine they'd force people to use 64 bit via an update.
It's customary to give the option.
http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel
- jrochkind1 12y agoIs there any point to giving the option for OSX? When was the last OSX version that did not support 64bit? Is there any reason to prefer a 32bit version on an OSX that supports 64bit? Real questions, not rhetorical! If I look at http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel , they list a Windows 32-bit channel and separate 64-bit channel, but only one Mac channel. I'm not sure if this means anything about their release intentions, or if the page may still be updated.
- comex 12y agoOS X has supported x86_64 applications since 10.5 (Leopard), so there's no problem there if your CPU supports it; moreover, the last OS X release to support 32-bit-only x86 CPUs was 10.6 (Snow Leopard). However, Chrome does support 10.6, so I guess this release may have the effect of dropping support for some Mac models from 2006 that previously worked.
- grumblestumble 12y agoIt's customary to give the option when there's an option. If you go to the Chrome download page, there is no longer any option to download the 32-bit version.