3 ms·
"... NCIS report for Aaron Swartz was negative ..." excellent. the other thing I don't get is flags should be going up if nothing bad is being turned up. as f
by bootload 17y ago
"... NCIS report for Aaron Swartz was negative ..."
excellent.
the other thing I don't get is flags should be going up if nothing bad is being turned up. as for being legal? I bet Pacer didn't think/want 20% of their records searched even if they opened them up. It's unstated but it would be fair to assume this.
- rglullis 17y agoPresumption of guilt?
- bootload 17y ago"... Presumption of guilt? ..." From what I've read here they (fbi) are doing simple background checks and want to talk. An interview/Talk doesn't imply a presumption of guilt. Having said that the fact that the "pacer" usage may have been excessive & someone has complained means anyone with excessive usage is going to be looked at. There is no black and white here but shades of grey. The records probably should be in public hands. The means used so far might be illegal. The tussle is "public access" vs "payment" and the action taken is making the right waves to hightlight the need for the former ~ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13records.html http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13records.html