4 ms·
Who's to know why they were wrong — it's just amusing to see the same error come up again. I prefer the theory that they look around their offices and extrapola
by Tloewald 12y ago
Who's to know why they were wrong — it's just amusing to see the same error come up again. I prefer the theory that they look around their offices and extrapolate ;-)
- dandelany 12y agoThey weren't wrong, there's plenty of dust on the comet. The first photo of the initial landing site is visible precisely because of the shadow cast by a giant cloud of dust kicked up by the lander.
- Tloewald 12y agoThey were wrong about the amount of dust, not the presence of dust -- as was the case with the moon landing. There's plenty of dust on the moon, too, just not oceans of it.