3 ms·
Wrong. Front running has a very specific definition and requires a broker to be acting on behalf of a client. 1. Broker takes client order. 2. broker trades h
by lrm242 12y ago
Wrong. Front running has a very specific definition and requires a broker to be acting on behalf of a client.
1. Broker takes client order.
2. broker trades his own account first (with knowledge of client order)
3. Broker executes client order.
If you don't have clients you can't be front running. It is black and white and as simple as that.
- Retric 12y agoWrong It's also Front running and illegal to pay a Broker for prior knowledge in front of their clients trades. Also, the term may apply to using insider knowledge. Khan & Lu (2008: 1) define front running as "trading by some parties in advance of large trades by other parties, in anticipation of profiting from the price movement that follows the large trade". They find evidence consistent with front-running through short sales ahead of large stock sales by CEOs on the New York Stock Exchange. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_running http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_running " "Front running" is sometimes used informally for a broker's tactics related to trading on proprietary information before its clients have been given the information. For example, analysts and brokers who buy shares in a company just before the brokerage firm is about to recommend the stock as a strong buy, are practising this type of "front running". Brokers have been convicted of securities laws violations in the United States for such behavior. "
- tedunangst 12y agoCalling all insider trading "front running" does nothing but muddy the waters.
- Retric 12y agoNot all insider information, just insider information about large pending trades.