3 ms·
Last I checked (a few years ago admittedly) GNU Smalltalk didn't include line numbers in error messages, which made it hardly usable for anything > 300 lines.
by pfedor 17y ago
Last I checked (a few years ago admittedly) GNU Smalltalk didn't include line numbers in error messages, which made it hardly usable for anything > 300 lines. Does anyone know whether it changed?
- spooneybarger 17y agopaolo has greatly advanced the state of gnu smalltalk. you might want to give it another look.
- icey 17y agoDoes that include providing line numbers in error messages?
- spooneybarger 17y agohttp://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/233 http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/233