3 ms·
What @seanflyon said. Plus part of the perceived value of working with a 3rd party recruiter as a company is that they are actively sourcing and screening candi
by redmattred 12y ago
What @seanflyon said. Plus part of the perceived value of working with a 3rd party recruiter as a company is that they are actively sourcing and screening candidates to make sure they are a good fit. Just simply contacting them doesn't mean you screened them up front.
There are situations where a candidate learns about the job through a recruiter, speaks with them, and then applies to the job on their own. In those cases a recruiter have a more legitimate claim, depending on the contract they've negotiated with the company.
For the company, there is a strong incentive not to pay a 20-25% finders fee if they don't have to so recruiters have to be their own advocates in these situations.
- dbbolton 12y agoI agree 20% is excessive if the recruiter just told someone about the job, but it seems like they should still get something for finding the future employee in the first place.