3 ms·
These are actually just wrong. Computers are dirt cheap, for instance, and most programmers who aren't working on games don't need one that costs more than $1,0
by mattmaroon 17y ago
These are actually just wrong. Computers are dirt cheap, for instance, and most programmers who aren't working on games don't need one that costs more than $1,000 for any reason at all. In fact they shouldn't want a cutting edge one, they'd rather see how the software runs on the computers that will typically host it.
The overhead costs of starting the next Google are significantly lower than the overhead costs of starting a McDonalds.
- Confusion 17y agoOK, I'll bite. If a set of tests on a feature that I'm working on runs in 15 seconds instead of in 30, I'll save that 15 seconds dozens of times. The benefits of a faster computer add up fast and shilling out a few hundred extra dollars is well worth it. Luckily, my employer got that. Especially fortunate since it doesn't seem like my Z61m will be replaced anytime soon (as we aren't doing so well) and a 2GHz core-duo with 2GB of RAM is only now starting to be limiting. If he had gone for a budget option, I would be tearing my hair out by now.
- mattmaroon 17y agoEven an extra few hundred per computer is virtually nothing. You can outfit a whole 5 man shop with top of the line Dells for what a McDonalds pays for one deep fryer. My startup quite literally ran for about 6 months on what one top of the line commercial fryer costs.