5 ms·
Playing the devil's advocate here, but why is the concept of free-agent developers who (a) command huge premiums, and (b) prefer working on short, intense sprin
by r0h1n 12y ago
Playing the devil's advocate here, but why is the concept of free-agent developers who (a) command huge premiums, and (b) prefer working on short, intense sprints instead of with one employer, still not here yet?
I'm not saying 10X Management is an example, but why can't individual programming be valued like, say, acting/singing etc.?
- patio11 12y agoMany consultancies work on this model, particularly in specialities where it is extraordinarily difficult to find anyone qualified or to retain them on W-2 payroll for a year at a time. Hate to toot my own horn, particularly as I no longer do much consulting, but if a hypothetical software company said "OK we have a product and it works but we can't convince our Dev team to build marketing plumbing and they don't know where to start even if we ask" one could hypothetically have called me up, gotten advice like "You should probably do lifecycle email", and if you were incapable of shipping that yourself in two weeks I could fix that for you for $X0,000. It works similarly if you need a crypto system validated, etc etc.
- Locke1689 12y agoFrom what I gather (mostly through blog osmosis), you kind of fell into that career through the experience you had marketing BCC. How would you suggest someone do this intentionally, and in varying specialties? That is, how do you decide to specialize in a marketable niche? Sure, if I already knew the marketing business I could probably worm my way into doing marketing contracting. Similarly, if I were an expert in cryptography I could start fielding requests. What if, however, I'm just a proficient developer qualified in relatively mainstream technologies. By simple analysis of economic principles, I'm not highly valued due to the availability of general talent, so I have to subspecialize in some valuable niche. But how do I choose that specialty ahead of time? I can always choose an arbitrary specialty, but it's possible the demand isn't there. My specialty, for example, may be in compilers, but I have an inkling feeling that being able to untwist some truly horrific legacy Win32 COM garbage may be the more lucrative endeavor. How do I test these theories without wasting a huge amount of time and money?
- patio11 12y agoHow do I test these theories without wasting a huge amount of time and money? Take buyers and sellers of technology services out to coffee and ask what they buy/sell and what they would buy/sell but for the impossibility of finding it in the market. For example, you could take me out to coffee. It's no secret what I would tell you there, since it is practically in 50ft tall fire letters on my blog: When I was consulting, I made systems which made software companies lots of money, most typically by applying engineering tactics to marketing/sales ends for them. The prototypical deliverable was "Your SaaS app now sends a lifecycle email campaign." My sweet-spot client is a software company with $10 million to $50 million a year in annual sales. (There exist hundreds of these, most of whom will never even be mentioned on HN, in any context.) I am not particularly a supergenius with copywriting -- I just apply a bit of formula, horse sense, and personal experience with experimentation, and it works much of the time. I picked it up with a bit of reading and a lot of doing. Do I think that the average HNer could do this 6 weeks after having announced an intention to seriously start doing this? Yes. Can my average consulting client find someone to do this full-time for them? No, not for love or money. Do I think this niche would support a consultancy full-time? Yes. This tiny little sliver of the global economy would support ten clones of my consultancy, selling 30 weeks a year, without coming close to satisfying market demand for this service. Price is a signal that the market generates to cue potential service providers that there exists unsatisfied demand for a service. The fact that the market does not clear in e.g. marketing technology or cryptosystem verification or what have you, even at rates in the $20k+ a week region, should signal "Well, that would be a lucrative practice to be in."
- tom_b 12y agoIt boggles my mind that you say the average HNer could do this in 6 weeks. Not in a "I don't believe you sense" but rather in a "that's so outside of my mindset that it doesn't compute." And this is coming from someone who remembers reading stuff from you on Joel's Business of Software forums, so it's not like I haven't seen the full path from BCC to consulting to AppointmentReminder . . . Personally, I fall into the trap of thinking, oh, I couldn't do that unless I master <insert obscure tech at the Knuth level here>. Which is clearly just not the differentiating skill here . . .
- psykotic 12y agoI know programmers who fit your description but they are rare. I'm talking about extremely high-paid contract developers who operate as individual contributors and not as hands-off consultants. Those guys are brought in as firefighters on critical projects that are failing and have looming deadlines. For example, one of them has helped out on many sports video games, which have yearly releases on an immovable schedule. Beyond that, most contract ICs are used as temporary headcount padding that are subject to much laxer hiring standards than full-time ICs.