4 ms·
The title ought to change to specify that this is an SMIL guide. It's too bad that Internet Explorer doesn't support SMIL [0]. This unfortunately eliminates SM
by daigoba66 12y ago
The title ought to change to specify that this is an SMIL guide.
It's too bad that Internet Explorer doesn't support SMIL [0]. This unfortunately eliminates SMIL from consideration for many projects.
[0] http://caniuse.com/#feat=svg-smil http://caniuse.com/#feat=svg-smil
- jarek-foksa 12y agoSVG 1.1 spec shares some definitions with SMIL spec, but if I recall correctly SVG working group is planning to get rid of any mention of SMIL in SVG 2 and instead rely on the terms and concepts outlined in the Web Animation spec [1] (the API will remain the same though). I would change the title to "A Guide to Declarative Animation in SVG". [1] http://w3c.github.io/web-animations/ http://w3c.github.io/web-animations/
- dang 12y agoWe made the title match the original, which has SMIL in parens.