2 ms·
Not exactly; just considering the trade-off of sacred cow vs. tasty burger. I'm not opposed to property or possessions, but I do think the burden of proof is on
by lukifer 12y ago
Not exactly; just considering the trade-off of sacred cow vs. tasty burger. I'm not opposed to property or possessions, but I do think the burden of proof is on the believer rather than the skeptic, and our society seems to put a higher sanctity on property than on community or commons, as though it were an immutable axiom of the universe. (I'd also really like to hear a First Principle on the subject that doesn't contain "Because USSR".)
- tptacek 12y agoIs there a principled argument for net neutrality that would persuade someone with a conventional perspective on property?