4 ms·
This is a very good article. The reference to the newly published book Faster, Higher, Stronger: How Sports Science Is Creating a New Generation of Superathlete
by tokenadult 12y ago
This is a very good article. The reference to the newly published book Faster, Higher, Stronger: How Sports Science Is Creating a New Generation of Superathletes--and What We Can Learn from Them by Mark McClusky prompted me to request that book from my friendly public library. I like how the article looks at the absolute skill levels among professional competitors in chess and professional performers in orchestral music and shows that the skill level in those and many other domains has been steadily rising in my lifetime. There is still a lot of untapped potential in most individuals alive today that can be developed even at adult ages.
As the article reports, "What we’re seeing is, in part, the mainstreaming of excellent habits. In the late nineteen-fifties, Raymond Berry, the great wide receiver for the Baltimore Colts, was famous for his attention to detail and his obsessive approach to the game: he took copious notes, he ate well, he studied film of his opponents, he simulated entire games by himself, and so on. But, as the journalist Mark Bowden observed, Berry was considered an oddball. The golfer Ben Hogan, who was said to have 'invented practice,' stood out at a time when most pro golfers practiced occasionally, if at all. Today, practicing six to eight hours a day is just the price of admission on the P.G.A. Tour. Everyone works hard. Everyone is really good." This kind of cultural change can still go a lot further in a lot of fields on human performance. A culture of continual efforts at self-improvement has hardly even begun in many occupations.
The article's conclusion about improving the performance of elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States is thoughtful, and also refers to good new books, Building a Better Teacher by Elizabeth Green and The Teacher Wars by Dana Goldstein. Studies of educational effectiveness in the United States consistently show that the variance in teacher quality in any one school swamps the variance in school quality between one school and another, so any child in any school district is at risk of getting an ineffective teacher. (Although schools in poor neighborhoods of the United States, on the whole, have the greatest difficulty in hiring and retaining good teachers.) Anything that can help teachers learn to teach better before or after they began working in the classroom will have massive social benefits. An economist who has studied teacher effectiveness for years shows that the best teachers are almost literally worth their weight in gold, while the worst teachers have negative added value for their pupils.[1] Bringing a culture of continual self-improvement in America's schools is a project of crucial national importance.
[1] http://hanushek.stanford.edu/publications/valuing-teachers-how-much-good-teacher-worth http://hanushek.stanford.edu/publications/valuing-teachers-h...
- JacobAldridge 12y agoIn your experience, are there some tools or even a general cultural approach that benefit homeschooling parents which could be applied to mainstream teachers?
- tokenadult 12y agoThis is a quick reply because I'm about to go out. Feel free to ask follow-up questions. One thing that homeschoolers fearlessly do is reject curriculum materials if they don't work, and use different materials for different children. Many classroom teachers are not at liberty to do either of these things officially, but if they do them on the sly, they will be helping the learners in their care.
- germinalphrase 12y agoIt is not necessarily a question of tools, techniques, or cultural approach. Are there new ideas that should be shared and adopted - of course - however, the greatest advantage a home school teacher (in many cases a parent) has over mainstream teachers is the ability to work one-on-one for extended periods of time with a single pupil. There is no greater way to impact the education and growth of a young person than to understand and teach to that specific student (which is only partially an academic task). As a high school teacher, I am fully aware that there is more that could be done to modify my instruction and learning goals to more closely align with the individual needs of my students - however it is not possible to do so with while teaching 30 students at a time, 90 students per day, with a total head count just short of two hundred unique individuals each semester. This is the core of Bloom's Two Sigma Problem and the holy grail for educational advancement - but, currently, this is the trade-off we make by sending our children to traditional schools rather than educating them ourselves.
- dmurray 12y ago> I like how the article looks at the absolute skill levels among professional competitors in chess and professional performers in orchestral music... The chess example is controversial as it is not correct to consider the Elo ratings "absolute". They work poorly when players are separated into two groups, e.g. by time or geography, with little interaction between the groups. Many chess players believe there has been "rating inflation" causing 2700 today to be weaker than 2700 forty years ago. Personally I don't believe the claims of rating inflation and broadly agree with the article that there are 30+ players active today making moves as good as the top one or two from the 70s.