3 ms·
@prayerslayer: nothing wrong with require.js, the main goal is to create a more portable alternative and more importantly to add couple of new and nonstandard w
by fixjs 12y ago
@prayerslayer: nothing wrong with require.js, the main goal is to create a more portable alternative and more importantly to add couple of new and nonstandard ways of modular coding as a proposal for the JavaScript community.
- burntsushi 12y agoCould you please explain in more technical detail? What specifically are the trade-offs between DefineJS and RequireJS?
- Theyeard 12y agoI'd rather see technical details too plus maybe a comparison between require.js/almond and define.js. Currently it's not clear what are the advantages of define.js. N.b. another AMD loader (30 lines of JS): https://curiosity-driven.org/amd-loader-with-promises https://curiosity-driven.org/amd-loader-with-promises
- arcatek 12y agoExamples would be nice. I'm not especially a require fanboy, I use almost exclusively ES6 modules nowadays, but i'm not sure to understand what your library brings.