2 ms·
Unless I'm missing something, for this to be useful, at least to normal people, there would seem to be a huge step missing whereby every object in the world has
by Joeboy 12y ago
Unless I'm missing something, for this to be useful, at least to normal people, there would seem to be a huge step missing whereby every object in the world has to be modelled and put in a database. Also you'd have to be able to locate your 2d objects in the 3d database, but that is at least theoretically tractable I guess.
Edit: It sounds cool, but maybe a bit misleadingly advertised.
- rayalez 12y agoI think that 3D scanners would be a perfect solution to this. It becomes easier and easier to digitize real world objects, even based on a single-camera video. http://youtu.be/gu5Ywwb4RaU http://youtu.be/gu5Ywwb4RaU
- Joeboy 12y agoThat stuff looks cool, and I want to play with photogrammetry stuff when I have some spare time. I think it's a bit optimistic to say it's a "solution" to this though. It's another tool that can help with the modelling + positioning + texturing + lighting + rendering + compositing workflow, but I don't think we're anywhere near a "3D photo editing tool" that can be used by normal people.