4 ms·
> corporate capture of politics If you look at which companies can actually make things happen in DC[1], it's the ones that are regulated (the reasons for this
by declan 12y ago
> corporate capture of politics
If you look at which companies can actually make things happen in DC[1], it's the ones that are regulated (the reasons for this should be obvious with some thought). Those are not Silicon Valley companies, by and large, but telecommunications firms like AT&T and VZ.
And it's those telecommunications firms that have long-standing surveillance "partnerships" with the NSA, according to leaked Snowden docs, which I wrote about last year here:
http://www.cnet.com/news/surveillance-partnership-between-nsa-and-telcos-points-to-at-t-verizon/ http://www.cnet.com/news/surveillance-partnership-between-ns...
Here's one reason those regulated telecom companies may not be eager to see reform happen:
"ATT, Verizon, Sprint Are Paid Cash By NSA For Your Private Communications"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/09/23/attverizonsprint-are-paid-cash-by-nsa-for-your-private-communications/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/09/23/attveri...
[1] AT&T/VZ/Comcast rolled Google/eBay/etc. on Net neutrality in Congress. Twice. Silicon Valley-backed NN bills were defeated in both the House and the Senate. And heck, Silicon Valley can't even get a permanent R&D tax credit passed. They've been trying forever to get a ECPA reform passed (this has failed). DMCA reform? Over a decade, nothing. They should be heavyweights or superheavyweights but they're bantamweights instead.
- throwawaykf05 12y agoGiven that the NSA was going to get data from the telcos in any case, you'd rather they got it for free? If there is some sort of behavior you want to discourage somebody from engaging in, the simplest way of doing so is to make them pay for it. Even nominal fees can be a significant deterrent (this is why ads and eyeballs are the currency of the web). Without this monetary friction, there would doubtless have been even more rampant data collection. Additionally, the link you provided itself says that the money the telcos got from that is a small fraction of their total revenues, so I am not sure how compelling a reason that would be to oppose reform.
- declan 12y agoThat's why I said "one reason."