Key point “good” is a seductive bait word. Art / language is emergent in nature, as is our modeling of science and other realms. As such, some work may not mee

Key point “good” is a seductive bait word. Art / language is emergent in nature, as is our modeling of science and other realms. As such, some work may not meet the privileged notions of “good” until long after an author has offered her work. And this doesn't begin to touch on Barthe's / Foucault's reading of authorship and its relevance. Likewise, work may become “not good” based on an equal number of complex facets. So in this emergent light, are you specifically requesting citation, or would you prefer to create, and in turn judge and explore, the meaning of a text yourself?