3 ms·
It seems highly unlikely that any scientists would make subpar choices that may compromise a long-term project on the off chance that it might cause some politi
by this_user 12y ago
It seems highly unlikely that any scientists would make subpar choices that may compromise a long-term project on the off chance that it might cause some political discomfort. The latter isn't even particularly likely since there is a large difference between nuclear power as an energy source on Earth and nuclear technology for scientific use in space. In addition most of the public doesn't even know or is interested in the technical details of a mission like this. Therefore it is extremely unlikely that using RTG technology would have caused any kind of political problems which makes avoiding said technology on political grounds simply nonsensical when it has the potential to compromise the overall mission.
- guscost 12y agoI think you are 1) overestimating the amount of independence that a typical space agency project actually enjoys and 2) underestimating both the amount and variety of PR that a high-profile space mission like this one generates.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoThe issue is that Europe never developed RTG technology because of politics, so scientists couldn't even consider it as an available choice.