3 ms·
Last I had checked, using the browser bundle in Tails with javascript disabled puts the fingerprint to about 1 in 22,000, but it's been a couple months since I
by Forbo 12y ago
Last I had checked, using the browser bundle in Tails with javascript disabled puts the fingerprint to about 1 in 22,000, but it's been a couple months since I last tested. Going to fire up my machine and see what it shows now, will report back with results shortly.
Update: Tor Browser in Tails 1.2 with javascript disabled returns a fingerprint that's shared by 1 in 2,615 with 11.35 bits of identifying information.
- newaccountfool 12y agoIs that not rather narrow? How is it not say 1 in 100k?
- kissickas 12y agoHow do I have more identifying bits of information, but it's shared by more browsers? >Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 4,955 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. >Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 12.27 bits of identifying information. I figured it would be more unique due to my running Tor Browser on a Mac - but I don't see how the math works out. Unless it actually has a count of machines with information identical to mine?
- Goopplesoft 12y ago> Unless it actually has a count of machines with information identical to mine? How else would it work (not assuming even distribution)? Im sure its a hash counter.
- mbrubeck 12y ago1/4955 means your fingerprint is shared by fewer browsers than the other commenter's 1/2915. If your fingerprint is totally unique (like mine, with 22.16 bits of information) then it is shared by only 1 in 4,697,672 browsers in their dataset.