3 ms·
>> Probably, I could have put it in more diplomatic language >Probably you could have used more diplomatic language Yes, that's what I meant. As a side-note,
by zerr 12y ago
>> Probably, I could have put it in more diplomatic language
>Probably you could have used more diplomatic language
Yes, that's what I meant. As a side-note, that word is not quite corresponding to what "faggot" means in western culture, it is a more generic term, but anyway...
>Such a comment has zero place on Hacker News
Agree. As with pro-Putin propaganda. In the future, I'll try to just flag similar comments (just found that feature, btw).
>I know it takes work
Exactly, especially if you're from a country in which Russia organized massacres...
- dang 12y agoThis reply does not seem much in the spirit of what I wrote. Every sentence you've written here manages to evade the point and/or blame others—except "Agree.", which I'm therefore not feeling sure you do. Please don't break the rules again, regardless of what bad things other people may have done.
- zerr 12y ago>This reply does not seem much in the spirit of what I wrote Mmm, I guess this is the case when they say it is somewhat hard to communicate with electronic text. Since I'm not native English speaker, it might be dry but in essence I tried to put: 1. Motivation 2. Agreement, even with the presence of Motivation 3. Wish that I could have just flagged without commenting - and the plan of doing so in the future.
- dang 12y agoOk, that makes sense. I agree with you about the perils of communicating online.