4 ms·
I doubt super-sampling beats Google's HDR+ [1] in either range or speed (the 1020 takes about 4 seconds per "normal" picture). The 1020 does have much better de
by higherpurpose 12y ago
I doubt super-sampling beats Google's HDR+ [1] in either range or speed (the 1020 takes about 4 seconds per "normal" picture). The 1020 does have much better details and such, but that's most likely due to a 4x bigger sensor and higher quality lens.
[1] - http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2014/10/hdr-low-light-and-high-dynamic-range.html http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2014/10/hdr-low-light-and...
- vanderZwan 12y agoThose 4 seconds are due to post-processing one sensor image. Google's HDR+ combines multiple images in a novel way to create a higher dynamic range. In theory you could use that with the Nokia camera as well. Of course, that would slow it down even further.