5 ms·
"[Reporters: if you want to share this URL, append "?share=1" to the end of the URL so that viewers can view this answer without the regwall]" Or maybe do that
by thejosh 12y ago
"[Reporters: if you want to share this URL, append "?share=1" to the end of the URL so that viewers can view this answer without the regwall]"
Or maybe do that be default instead of forcing people to register?
- joeguilmette 12y agoWhen Quora first came on the scene I was a power user. That kind of shit spoiled things fast for me.
- sillysaurus3 12y agoPersonally, I'm less inclined to put up a fight about that than I once was. I argued pretty passionately that it was terrible and etc, but I've since spent some time on Quora. It has fascinating content. We should probably accept that their growth strategy is either brilliant and succeeding even without our Expert Input, or their growth strategy is dumb yet Quora is successful in spite of it. Either way, bringing it up every time Quora pops up is probably more harmful than helpful at this point.
- majani 12y agoQuora is successful? Their userbase is still below 5 million and most of their traffic comes from a third world country(India), and they still have exactly zero ads 5 years on after raising 161 million in capital. Quora is an unmitigated failure at this point.
- sillysaurus3 12y agoPerhaps. All I'm saying is that they have good content. Give it a try, you may be surprised to find you like it. Even if they're on an implosion trajectory, Internet Archive will make sure most or all of it stays online. So it won't be a failure if you measure success as "generating positive contributions to the world" instead of dollars.
- toomuchtodo 12y agoCan the Internet Archive/ArchiveTeam scrape Quora with their regwall?
- ghaff 12y agoQuestion really is will. And IA respects robots.txt. Which is very reasonable given that they operate within a quasi-legal domain in which it's best that they don't archive anything that the archive owner doesn't at least implicitly want to be archived.
- toomuchtodo 12y agoWhich is why you scrape while the site is in business, and then only display once they've gone out of business.
- codinghorror 12y agoNope. "Worth noting: Quora has no public API, no backup/export tools, blocks anonymous display of answers, and banned the Wayback Machine entirely." https://twitter.com/waxpancake/status/453958676529696769 https://twitter.com/waxpancake/status/453958676529696769
- sillysaurus3 12y agoThey banned Wayback Machine? Quora, you're making it so difficult to like you.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- jacquesm 12y agoEspecially since they are eternally at risk of disappearing, I'm not too optimistic about Quora in the long run. Their competition is doing a lot better.
- 12y ago
- arfliw 12y agoYou might want to let their investors (who include Y Combinator) know - because they keep pouring money into Quora at ever higher valuations.
- jarek 12y agoThe greater fool theory of investing
- jacquesm 12y agoPouring money into a company more or less requires ever higher valuations otherwise it would be much harder to find future investors. The question then becomes what kind of assumptions underly their businessplan that they use to justify these higher valuations. These can make for very interesting reading, usually they translate into a loose form of: for every 'x' dollars of investment we can generate 'y' dollars (usually a multiple of 'x' ;) ) of turnover keeping the ship afloat long enough to pull in the next round of funding. As long as the funding keeps coming it will look really good to the untrained eye. The real issue of course is what the expected lifetime value is of the customers when taking into account the amount of overhead. If the balance here is close to zero it can become quite hard to distinguish the ultimate losers from the winners. 'At scale' then becomes the key, if you can't make it fly at a small size the theory is that the company will do just fine if you just scale it up drastically while keeping the overhead steady. This is a hard problem. Since Quora's investors presumably did financial due diligence before they invested it is safe to assume that the story is a complex one and any variation on the theme mentioned above will be hard to dig up. The degree of desperation with which they try to monetize their traffic is a good indicator about what's going on behind the scenes. Barometer: slowly dropping.
- serve_yay 12y agoOh, well, the investors said so. They're always right!
- kamaal 12y ago>>and most of their traffic comes from a third world country(India) I'm not sure what you mean by this. But what has the traffic coming from India(third world country, seriously?) got anything to do with their success/failure?
- vdaniuk 12y agoIndia is an unique, magical and increasingly important country and I love its culture and people. However if half of its citizens don't have a toilet in their homes, yeah, its a third world country.[0] As usual, that's not the problem with the people of India per se, but with the long term path-dependent development of country that has been a British colony for too long. [0]http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-17362837 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-17362837
- majani 12y agoIt contributes to their failure because third world advertising rates are quite low.
- justhw 12y agoQuora could be so much useful but they make it hard to use. Here's a pastebin link http://pastebin.com/FAYF2D9b http://pastebin.com/FAYF2D9b to read freely what Yishan wrote.