OK, but I don't see how git having those capabilities makes it inappropriate for cases where you don't need them. I guess I can appreciate the single-file revi

OK, but I don't see how git having those capabilities makes it inappropriate for cases where you don't need them. I guess I can appreciate the single-file revision control thing, since that is something git doesn't do well. But, I am usually OK with a whole directory being under revision control. All the other stuff is irrelevant, I'm pretty sure. Don't want branches and tags (I guess that's what "multi-fork" is referring to)? Don't use'em. Don't want multi-user? Doesn't matter, git doesn't lock files, and the user never needs to think about users if they are the only contributor to the repository.