4 ms·
I appreciate you sharing your experience, this is something we founders are not enough prepared to go through. Two comments IMHO: - Would you have said yes an
by ar7hur 12y ago
I appreciate you sharing your experience, this is something we founders are not enough prepared to go through.
Two comments IMHO:
- Would you have said yes and looked into the details of their offer, you would have realized that the $12M are not upfront. Through retention packages and revesting, most of the price is typically paid over 3 or 4 years. So the offer was probably less attractive than it initially looks.
- $12M is never a good outcome for investors (at least big angels and VCs). They make their returns only on big exits.
- jf22 12y ago>They make their returns only on big exits. Don't they make returns anytime their money invested is less than the money gained from the sale?
- mhartl 12y agoIn a narrow sense, yes, but virtually all investor returns typically come from a few big winners. For example, although many Y Combinator startups have achieved great success, most of YC's returns come from just three companies: Airbnb, Stripe, and Dropbox. If all an investor's winning startups exited at the ~$10m level, their returns would be anemic at best, and would quite possibly be negative after factoring in losses from failed companies. I think that's what the grandparent comment was getting at.
- psykovsky 12y agoAnd let's be honest, AirBnB will go the way of Uber, regulated out of existance. I honestly don't know why it didn't happened yet, for both.
- sumedh 12y agoNot exactly. There will be couple of other companies in their portfolio which would shut down and the VCs would lose all their money. So they really need a big exit which would make up for all the other losses.
- mattzito 12y ago> Through retention packages and revesting, most of the price is typically paid over 3 or 4 years. I'd be very careful with "Typically". It's not at all uncommon for acquirers to write a check, and then tack on retention packages for key employees. They very easily could have intended a $12m cash buyout, with another $2m for retention, spread over the team.