4 ms·
Moving our usage totally to the cloud is not a great idea, it seems. Yes, we get convenience, but at the same time lose autonomy, control, and freedom over our
by jmsmistral 12y ago
Moving our usage totally to the cloud is not a great idea, it seems. Yes, we get convenience, but at the same time lose autonomy, control, and freedom over our computing.
RMS has a good (albeit slightly extreme) view on this: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s...
This view has people discussing the issues e.g. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/09/why-stallman-is-wrong-when-he-calls-cloud-computing-stupid/ http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/09/why-st...
All in all, if we as users demand web apps that respect our freedom, and employ non-proprietary file formats, then this would be a non-issue. There are a number of ways this could be implemented... one would be to provide a software package (with source code), available to be downloaded and run locally on one's machine, if the product changes or gets trashed. Of course, complete access to your online data is necessary (i.e. ability to download your data as when you please).
- fiatjaf 12y agoThat's why everybody needs Sandstorm: https://blog.sandstorm.io/news/2014-07-21-open-source-web-apps-require-federated-hosting.html https://blog.sandstorm.io/news/2014-07-21-open-source-web-ap...
- jmsmistral 12y agoThat's actually pretty cool!... and it's licensed under the Apache v2 license, which makes it free software ;)