The summary basically is that for about twice the money of the nexus 5 you get worse battery life, much dimmer screen, and generally slower performance than the

The summary basically is that for about twice the money of the nexus 5 you get worse battery life, much dimmer screen, and generally slower performance than the nexus 5. Other reviews recently posted: http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/12/7200705/nexus-6-review http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/12/7200705/nexus-6-review http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/11/nexus-6-review-the-premium-price-still-comes-with-compromises/ http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/11/nexus-6-review-the-pr... http://www.anandtech.com/show/8687/the-nexus-6-review http://www.anandtech.com/show/8687/the-nexus-6-review I was pretty shocked how bad the screen is, scored something like #26 of 28 phones in brightness, similarly poor with saturation accuracy. Arstechnia seems to think the slow I/O is the worst offender for the general laggyness. Read bandwidth was 73% of the nexus 5, 37% of a note 4, and 30% of the Moto X 2014 (well regarded for it's responsiveness). Pretty disappointing. Too bad google didn't pick something like the droid turbo/Moto Maxx for the next nexus device.